In case of a refusal to sign a bill passed twice by the Legislative Council, what must the Chief Executive do if the new Legislative Council passes it again?

The correct answer to the question about the Chief Executive's responsibilities upon a refusal to sign a bill that has been passed twice by the Legislative Council is to accept the bill once it is passed again by a new Legislative Council. This requirement is grounded in Article 50 of the Hong Kong Basic Law, which states that if the Legislative Council passes a bill twice, the Chief Executive is mandated to sign it.

When the Chief Executive refuses to sign a bill, the legislative process allows the Council to reconsider and potentially pass the same bill again. This reflects the democratic process and the principle of checks and balances in governance, ensuring that the voice of the Legislative Council is respected after repeated consideration of the bill. The Chief Executive's acceptance of the bill indicates adherence to the legislative authority of the Council once the conditions for re-passage are met.

The implications of the other choices highlight a misunderstanding of the legislative process as defined by the Basic Law. Resigning would not be a requisite act tied to this legislative process. Explaining the refusal might be a form of communication, but it does not align with the procedural requirements following the re-passage of the bill. Similarly, appealing a decision is not a function assigned to the Chief Executive in this context, as the legislative procedure